New Thai govt to consider self-rule for Muslim south

[buksida]

Thailand's new government will consider granting some degree of self-rule to Muslim-majority provinces hit by bloody separatist unrest, Interior Minister Chalerm Yubamrung said on Tuesday.

More than 2,900 people have died in the southern provinces along the Malaysian border since separatist violence erupted four years ago.

The violence has become increasingly deadly over the last year, despite repeated olive branches offered by the previous military government.

In the latest unrest, a 40-year-old Buddhist man was shot and set ablaze in Pattani province late Monday, while three others were shot dead in nearby provinces early Tuesday, police said.

"I want to reaffirm that autonomy is possible, but we will have to discuss what type of autonomy it would be," Chalerm told reporters.

He said that Thailand would consider China's westernmost Xinjiang region, which is autonomous and predominantly Muslim, as a possible model.

"We cannot afford to allow so many deadly bombings. We must take measures to improve the situation and not just wait to be killed," he said.

However Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej was cautious about the proposal, saying his government would develop its policy on the insurgency within a few days.

"What Chalerm proposed, he thinks a good idea. But I think this idea could be dangerous and it could get out of hand," he told reporters after his second Cabinet meeting.

Chalerm said that unlike his predecessors, he would not make frequent trips to the Muslim south, saying such trips only spark more violence.

"Militants retaliate fiercely when a senior government minister visits the region," he said.

Chalerm also indicated that intelligence agencies continued to believe militants could seek to expand their activities and possibly stage bomb attacks in the southern commercial centre of Hat Yai or even in Bangkok.

He said night clubs in the southern region are particularly at risk because militants see them as an affront to Islam.

Chalerm said he would ask local officials to consider new restrictions on night life.

The region was an autonomous Malay Muslim sultanate until mainly Buddhist Thailand annexed it in 1902, provoking decades of tension.

Source: Channel News Asia

Samak dismisses Chalerm's special zone idea

Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej on Tuesday cautioned his interior minister for floating the idea of designating the Deep South as a special administrative zone in order to quell insurgency.

"I would like to tell Chalerm Yoobamrung that I have faced so many criticisms for making such comments," he said.

Samak said Chalerm should not rush to circulate his half-baked opinions on the security situation in the South before discussing and forming a firm stand with authorities concerned.

"I understand that Chalerm might have read and agreed about the special zone from some books, but it is dangerous to flaunt his stand when he should have discussed the issue within a small circle first," he said, in reference to a planned national security meeting to review the southern insurgency.

"I just want to say to Chalerm that his comments on such an issue might trigger more problems," he said.

Earlier the day, Chalerm said support for the establishment of a special administrative zone..

He said all government agencies concerned would have to help him study which should be the best model of special administrative zone for Yala, Pattani, and Narathiwat.

The zone could be modelled after China or Germany, he said.

He said he would develop the three provinces to be religious centres.

However, Chalerm said the military will be the main unit in charge of solving the Southern violence.

Source: The Nation

Thought: Looks like Samak is going to be about as good for the south as Thaksin was ... and why? because they don't get any votes down there!
_________________
I've got a bad feeling about this

[nevets]

No defernetly not , people can not go about killing and mutilating bodys, and then expect to get given what tantermounts to there own country and still suported by Thailand. They have to earn it and i dont think they have.

[STEVE G]

At least I agree with Samak in that it would be unwise to do anything on the issue of autonomy, or anything else, without discussing all of the possible implications first.